|  |  | Most 
        children 1) are 
        farsighted and 2) have sufficiently strong capacity to accommodate 
        that they can bring the focus of both of their eyes clearly on near as 
        well as distant objects. The degree of farsightedness (hyperopia) is determined 
        by refracting the eye after instillation of a cycloplegic eye drop. This 
        is called a cycloplegic refraction- a critical component of a confirmatory 
        eye exam.When cycloplegic drops are placed in Farsighted eyes that are not fully 
        corrected by spectacles or contact the vision is blurred, especially for 
        near. The amount of blur is related to the amount of farsightedness(1). 
        This principal can be used to “penalize” the better eye and 
        treat amblyopia.
 Compared to patching treatment for amblyopia, penalization has potential 
        advantages of:
 A) Improved compliance
 B) Maintained binocularity
 Potential disadvantages of penalization are:
 A) the better (sound) eye is blurred all day
 B) the patient may more sensitive to bright light
 C) the appearance of the eyes is different, especially with light blue 
        eyes
 Dilating drops have different durations of cycloplegic effect:
 Atropine 4-7 days dilated 1-2 days blurred
 Scopolamine 3-4 days dilated 1 day blurred(2)
 Homatropine 3-4 days dilated 1 day blurred
 Tropicamide 3-4 hours dilated minimal blur
 Phenylephrine 3-4 hours dilated least blur
 The Amblyopia Treatment Studies have shown 
        that:
 Daily atropine 1% works similarly to part-time patching(3)
 Weekend atropine 1% works similarly to daily atropine(4)
 Families found atropine slightly preferable to patching(5)
 Reducing “plus” spectacles may enhance the treatment with 
        atropiine(6)
 References:1. Arnold RW, Gionet EG, Hickel J, Owen M, Armitage MD. Duration and effect 
        of single-dose atropine: paralysis of accommodation in penalization treatment 
        of functional amblyopia. Binoc Vis and Strabismus Quart. Spring-Fall 2003;19(2):81-86.
 2. Arnold RW, Ellis F, Helveston E. Diplopia and Transdermal Scopolamine: 
        A case report. Am Orthoptic J. 1992;42:183-184.
 3. PEDIG. A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of 
        moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):268-278.
 4. PEDIG, Repka MX, Cotter SA, et al. A randomized trial of atropine regimens 
        for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. Dec 2004;111(11):2076-2085.
 5. PEDIG, Holmes JM, Beck RW, et al. Impact of patching and atropine treatment 
        on the child and family in the amblyopia treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol. 
        Nov 2003;121(11):1625-1632.
 6. PEDIG. The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: 
        experience of the amblyopia treatment study. Am J Ophthalmol. Oct 2003;136(4):630-639.
 |  |